The John T. Williams Dissertation Prize

In recognition of John T. Williams’ contribution to graduate training, the John T. Williams Award has been established for the best dissertation proposal in the area of political methodology.

2025 Winner
Recipient  Eunseong Oh
WorkBipartisan Cooperation
CitationThe winner of this year's John T. Williams Dissertation Proposal Prize is Eunseong Oh, a PhD candidate in political science at UC Riverside, for her dissertation proposal entitled, "Bipartisan Cooperation."  What caught the committee's attention was Oh's proposal to use multi-modal machine and deep learning methods that draw on textual, audio-visual and network features of administrative data.  Oh plans to use these data sources to measure theoretically relevant latent constructs such as legislators' deliberative cooperation and analytical capacity.  Oh's proposed dissertation would offer an opportunity to assess what current deep learning methods can reveal about the latent variables that drive political dynamics.  The same methodological pipeline proposed in this prospectus can be applied to a wide range of research questions in this domain.
Selection committeeJustin Esarey, Brenton Kenkel, Naijia Liu, Cyrus Samii, Walter Mebane (chair)

 

2024 Winner
RecipientSooahn Shin
WorkMoving beyond a Single-Dimensional Ideological Score
CitationThe John T. Williams Dissertation Prize for the 2023-2024 academic year is awarded to Sooahn Shin, a Ph.D. student in the Government Department at Harvard University. Her dissertation includes three essays that introduce innovative methodologies for political science research. The first essay, "Moving beyond a Single-Dimensional Ideological Score," features IssueIRT---a hierarchical IRT model that precisely estimates issue-specific latent political stances from roll-call votes, demonstrating its efficacy through simulations and a U.S. House validation study. The second essay proposes a novel framework for testing decision-making systems, assessing the effectiveness of human-alone, human-with-AI, and AI-alone configurations. This study examines the impact of pretrial risk assessment scores on judicial decisions and their accuracy compared to human judgment. The third essay explores causal inference with panel data, tackling the challenges of list-wise deletion and offering strategies to manage data missingness using auxiliary variables. Shin's dissertation makes important contributions to enhance the fields of computational social science and causal inference.
Selection committeeYamil Velez (Columbia), Erin Hartman (Berkeley), Walter Mebane (Michigan), and In Song Kim  (MIT, chair)

 

2023 Winner
RecipientGuilherme Duarte
WorkEssays on Automated Causal Inference for Partial Identification, Data Fusion, and Sensitivity Analysis
CitationThe William Prize Committee is pleased to announce Guilherme Duarte, a Ph.D. candidate in the Operations, Information, and Decisions Department at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, as the recipient of the John T. Williams Dissertation Prize for the 2022-2023 academic year. His dissertation proposal, "Essays on Automated Causal Inference for Partial Identification, Data Fusion, and Sensitivity Analysis," introduces significant methodological advances by employing robust computational techniques to automatically calculate precise bounds, termed "autobounds," for point estimates and uncertainty quantification. Duarte's proposal establishes a comprehensive framework for numerical solutions in partial identification, which he further extends to address key issues in transportability and external validity. His dissertation project advances the research agenda in algorithmic-assisted causality, demonstrating its utility in research designs that include instrumental variables, differences-in-differences, and mediation analysis.
Selection committeeYamil Velez (Columbia), Erin Hartman (Berkeley), Walter Mebane (Michigan), and In Song Kim  (MIT, chair)

 

Past Recipients

2022 Winner
RecipientMelody Huang (Berkeley)
Work“Three Essays on Causal Inference under Interference and Hypothesis Testing in Random Experiments”
CitationThis year's Williams Dissertation Prize is awarded to Melody Huang, Ph.d. candidate at the University of California, Berkeley, for her work on the credibility and generalizability of causal inference, more specifically, for her development of a new sensitivity analysis framework for weighted estimators in the generalizability setting. Unlike other frameworks, in Huang's set up the weights account for the confounding effect of sampling, not treatment. In addition, in her framework the parameters are guaranteed to be bounded across finite ranges. Hence there is no need to impose parametric assumptions on the outcome and selection models. Huang produces three sensitivity tools for generalizing experimental results: bias contour plots, a robustness value, and a benchmark that allows researchers to use observed covariates to estimate parameter values for the confounder. Her work potentially will strengthen our inferences about the effects of voter mobilization efforts and of other important public policies.
Selection committeeJohn Freeman (chair, Minnesota), Yamil Velez (Columbia), Erin Hartman (Berkeley), Walter Mebane (Michigan), and In Song Kim  (MIT)
2020 Winner
RecipientYe Wang (NYU)
Work“Three Essays on Causal Inference under Interference and Hypothesis Testing in Random Experiments”
CitationThe William Prize Committee is delighted to announce that the John T. Williams Dissertation Prize, 2020 was awarded to Ye Wang's dissertation proposal “Three Essays on Causal Inference under Interference and Hypothesis Testing in Random Experiments.” Wang makes two major methodological innovations. First, he develops a methodological framework to identify causal relationships in time-series cross-sectional data under arbitrary within-unit (temporal) and between-unit (spatial) interference. Wang shows, under the sequential ignorability assumption, how one can obtain unbiased/consistent estimates of cumulative causal effects via inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) estimators. More specifically, the proposed estimator identifies the expected average treatment effect generated by any particular treatment history of a representative unit on itself or on its neighbors. He demonstrates the usefulness of his innovation in a simulation and in a re-analysis of a published study of the impacts of a political reform in New York, accounting for temporal and spatial interference. He then applies this methodology to gauge the effect of protests in a handful of constituencies during the Umbrella Movement on electoral support for the opposition in Hong Kong. The second methodological contribution of Wang’s dissertation is to develop tools for testing nonlinear moderating effects in experiments. He adapts the evolutionary tree algorithm and sample splitting design to experimental analysis; the algorithm enables researchers to find the optimal partition of the moderator’s support on the training set for any loss function. He conducts a simulation study as well as a pilot study of the effects of a get-out-the-vote (GOTV) experiment, providing a promising direction for applying machine learning algorithms to experimental settings.
Selection committeeJohn Freeman (chair, Minnesota), Walter Mebane (Michigan), and In Song Kim  (MIT)
YearRecipientWork
2019Naijia Liu (Princeton)"Essays on Model Selection and Honest Inference"
2018Kevin McAlister (University of Michigan)"Roll Call Scaling in the U.S. Congress: Addressing the Deficiencies"
2017Naoki Egami (Princeton) 
2016Dean Knox (MIT)"Essays on Modeling and Causal Inference in Network Data"
2015Drew Dimmery (NYU)"Essays on Machine Learning and Causal Inference with Application to Nonprofits"
2014Yiqing Xu (MIT)"Causal Inference with Time-Series Cross-Section Data with Applications to Chinese Political Economy"
2013Scott Cook (University of Pittsburgh)The Contagion of Crises: Estimating Models of Endogenous and Interdependent Rare Events
2012Adriana Crespo-Tenorio (Washington University in St. Louis)Three Papers on the Political Consequences of Oil Price Volatility
2011Matthew Blackwell (Harvard)Essays in Political Methodology and American Politics
2010Teppei Yamamoto (Princeton)Essays on Quantitative Methodology for Political Science
2009Xun Pang (Washington University in St. Louis)A Bayesian Probit Hierarchical Model with AR(p) Errors and Non-nested Clustering: Studying Sovereign Creditworthiness and Political Institutions
2008Justin Grimmer (Harvard)A Bayesian Hierarchical Topic Model for Political Texts: Measuring and Explaining Legislator's Express Agenda
2007Arthur Spirling (University of Rochester)Bringing Intuition to Fruition: 'Turning Points' and 'Power' in Political Methodology
2006Roman Ivanchenko (Ohio State)Interactions Between the Supreme-Court and Congress: A Different Look at the Decision-Making Process

Past Selection Committees

YearCommittee
2019Xun Pang (Tsinghua University), Dean Knox (Princeton, recused) and Yiqing Xu (University of California, San Diego)
2018Xun Pang (Tsinghua, chair), Arthur Spirling (NYU), and Yiqing Xu (UCSD)
2017Xun Pang (Tsinghua, chair), Arthur Spirling (NYU), and Yiqing Xu (UCSD)
2016Justin Grimmer (Chicago, chair), Matt Blackwell (Harvard) and Teppi Yamamoto (MIT)
2015Curt Signorino (Chair), John Ahlquist, Jennifer Jerit
2014Curt Signorino (Chair), John Ahlquist, Jennifer Jerit
2013Michael Colaresi (Chair), Guy Whitten, Irfan Nooruddin
2012Michael Colaresi (Chair), Guy Whitten, Irfan Nooruddin
2011Guy Whitten (Chair), Michael Colaresi, Jonathan Nagler
2010Guy Whitten (Chair), Michael Colaresi, Jonathan Nagler
2009Guy Whitten (Chair), Michael Colaresi, Betsy Sinclair
2007John Aldrich (Chair), Michael Colaresi, Tse-Min Lin
2006John Aldrich (Co-Chair), Virginia Gray (Co-Chair), Patrick Brandt, Burt Monroe